nevanna: (Default)
Nevanna ([personal profile] nevanna) wrote2025-07-15 09:18 pm

Tuesday Top Five: Formative Fanfiction, Now With More Mutants

When listing five of the authors whom I most admired in the early years of the X-Men movie fandom - the ones whose work I am most likely to recommend to viewers experiencing those first movies for the first time - I ended up sourcing some links from fanfiction.net and LiveJournal, because some of these authors had their Moments before AO3 became the fandom hub that it is today. Also, I'm referring to all of these authors by the gender pronouns that they used when I knew them; if anybody has more recent information, please feel free to share it.

1. Andraste

Andraste’s love for and fascination with Charles Xavier – not as a saint or a monster but as a well-intentioned, flawed individual – captured my attention even when I still thought I hated that character. She’s written in both the movieverse and the comicverse, but my favorite of her works will always be “Ten Thousand Candles,” a character study of Charles after the events of X2.

2. Minisinoo

I talked about Min’s An Accidental Interception of Fate in a previous TT5 entry, as an example of what make her writing exceptional. (I will refrain from making the obvious “X” puns. You’re welcome.) Her characters and their world feel multidimensional and immediate, whether she’s writing high drama and action (which find their way into Accidental Interception, as well as Climb the Wind, Special, and Grail), or slice-of-life vignettes like “Of Teletubbies and Mutants on Saturday Mornings.” The latter is not only funny and sweet, but also stands as an interesting time capsule of fannish attitudes toward queer interpretations of characters.

3. Penknife

(Most of this author’s work is locked to AO3 users, so you need to have an account and be logged in if you want to read it.)

All of Penknife’s fic is wonderful, but I am usually most likely to recommend “Children’s Crusade” and “Twenty Random Facts about Xavier’s School for Gifted Youngsters.” (Are “Twenty Random Facts” fanfics still a thing? I’ve always liked that format.) Both works – like Min’s – portray daily life at Xavier’s School in really fascinating, believable ways. She’s another one of the writers who made me appreciate Charles as a character (and Charles/Erik as a pairing) more than I might have otherwise.

4. Sionnain

Sionnain sold me on Magneto/Rogue, a pairing that I would never have considered if we hadn’t gotten to know each other. When I watched X-Men ’97, in which that pairing is very much canon, I hoped that she felt some lingering sense of vindication.

5. Trismegistus/Vagabond Sal

Eighteen-year-old Nevanna was absolutely stunned by this author’s command of descriptive language and dialogue, which I might have tried – with varying degrees of success – to emulate. Of the stories that I’ve been able to find, Wayward, which was actually co-written, was the first one that I remember reading; Infinite Regress was the most intellectually interesting and made the most intriguing use of a character from the comics, and Caducity (to which I should add a content warning for physical and mental decline due to illness) show how skilled and inventive Trismegistus could be when writing telepathy.

What are some of the most memorable stories from your early days in fandom?
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal ([syndicated profile] smbc_comics_feed) wrote2025-07-15 11:20 am
brithistorian: (Default)
brithistorian ([personal profile] brithistorian) wrote2025-07-15 12:59 pm
Entry tags:

You'd think that Peter Jackson would have seen Jurassic Park...

Colossal Biosciences is planning to bring back the giant moa, a 3m (10 foot) tall flightless bird that went extinct around 600 years ago, shortly after humans arrived in New Zealand. Peter Jackson is one of the major investors. Considering the difficulties the Australians had when dealing with emus, which are only 2/3 the size of the great moa, they really need to consider that there was probably very good reason that the early New Zealanders wiped them out.

Daily Prompts ([syndicated profile] dailyprompts_feed) wrote2025-07-15 09:27 am
sovay: (Claude Rains)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2025-07-14 11:24 pm

Unread books on dusty shelves tell a story of their own

Because I am more familiar with the operas than the film scores of Erich Wolfgang Korngold and tend to avoid even famous movies with Ronald Reagan in them, it took until tonight for me to hear the main theme for Kings Row (1942), at which point the entire career of John Williams flashed before my eyes. Other parts of the score sound more recognizably, symphonically of their era, but that fanfare is a blast from the future it directly shaped: the standard set by Korngold's tone-poem, leitmotiv-driven approach to film composing, principal photography as the libretto to an opera. I love finding these taproots, even when they were lying around in plain sight.

I don't think that what I feel for the sea is nostalgia, but I am intrigued by this study indicating that generally people do: "Searching for Ithaca: The geography and psychological benefits of nostalgic places" (2025). I am surprised that more people are not apparently bonded to deserts or mountains or woodlands. Holidays by the sea can't explain all of it. I used to spend a lot of my life in trees.

I napped for a couple of hours this afternoon, but my brain could return any time now. The rest of my week is not conducive to doing nothing. The rest of the world is not conducive to losing time.
Health | The Atlantic ([syndicated profile] theatlantic_health_feed) wrote2025-07-14 10:21 pm

The Trump Administration Is About to Incinerate 500 Tons of Emergency Food

Posted by Hana Kiros

This article was featured in the One Story to Read Today newsletter. Sign up for it here.

Five months into its unprecedented dismantling of foreign-aid programs, the Trump administration has given the order to incinerate food instead of sending it to people abroad who need it. Nearly 500 metric tons of emergency food—enough to feed about 1.5 million children for a week—are set to expire tomorrow, according to current and former government employees with direct knowledge of the rations. Within weeks, two of those sources told me, the food, meant for children in Afghanistan and Pakistan, will be ash. (The sources I spoke with for this story requested anonymity for fear of professional repercussions.)

Sometime near the end of the Biden administration, USAID spent about $800,000 on the high-energy biscuits, one current and one former employee at the agency told me. The biscuits, which cram in the nutritional needs of a child under 5, are a stopgap measure, often used in scenarios where people have lost their homes in a natural disaster or fled a war faster than aid groups could set up a kitchen to receive them. They were stored in a Dubai warehouse and intended to go to the children this year.

Since January, when the Trump administration issued an executive order that halted virtually all American foreign assistance, federal workers have sent the new political leaders of USAID repeated requests to ship the biscuits while they were useful, according to the two USAID employees. USAID bought the biscuits intending to have the World Food Programme distribute them, and under previous circumstances, career staff could have handed off the biscuits to the United Nations agency on their own. But since Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency disbanded USAID and the State Department subsumed the agency, no money or aid items can move without the approval of the new heads of American foreign assistance, several current and former USAID employees told me. From January to mid-April, the responsibility rested with Pete Marocco, who worked across multiple agencies during the first Trump administration; then it passed to Jeremy Lewin, a law-school graduate in his 20s who was originally installed by DOGE and now has appointments at both USAID and State. Two of the USAID employees told me that staffers who sent the memos requesting approval to move the food never got a response and did not know whether Marocco or Lewin ever received them. (The State Department did not answer my questions about why the food was never distributed.)

In May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told representatives on the House Appropriations Committee that he would ensure that food aid would reach its intended recipients before spoiling. But by then, the order to incinerate the biscuits (which I later reviewed) had already been sent. Rubio has insisted that the administration embraces America’s responsibility to continue saving foreign lives, including through food aid. But in April, according to NPR, the U.S. government eliminated all humanitarian aid to Afghanistan and Yemen, where, the State Department said at the time, providing food risks benefiting terrorists. (The State Department has offered no similar justification for pulling aid to Pakistan.) Even if the administration was unwilling to send the biscuits to the originally intended countries, other places—Sudan, say, where war is fueling the world’s worst famine in decades—could have benefited. Instead, the biscuits in the Dubai warehouse continue to approach their expiration date, after which their vitamin and fat content will begin to deteriorate rapidly. At this point, United Arab Emirates policy prevents the biscuits from even being repurposed as animal feed.

Over the coming weeks, the food will be destroyed at a cost of $130,000 to American taxpayers (on top of the $800,000 used to purchase the biscuits), according to current and former federal aid workers I spoke with. One current USAID staffer told me he’d never seen anywhere near this many biscuits trashed over his decades working in American foreign aid. Sometimes food isn’t stored properly in warehouses, or a flood or a terrorist group complicates deliveries; that might result in, at most, a few dozen tons of fortified foods being lost in a given year. But several of the aid workers I spoke with reiterated that they have never before seen the U.S. government simply give up on food that could have been put to good use.

The emergency biscuits slated for destruction represent only a small fraction of America’s typical annual investment in food aid. In fiscal year 2023, USAID purchased more than 1 million metric tons of food from U.S. producers. But the collapse of American foreign aid raises the stakes of every loss. Typically, the biscuits are the first thing that World Food Programme workers hand to Afghan families who are being forced out of Pakistan and back to their home country, which has been plagued by severe child malnutrition for years. Now the WFP can support only one of every 10 Afghans who are in urgent need of food assistance. The WFP projects that, globally, 58 million people are at risk for extreme hunger or starvation because this year, it lacks the money to feed them. Based on calculations from one of the current USAID employees I spoke with, the food marked for destruction could have met the nutritional needs of every child facing acute food insecurity in Gaza for a week.

Despite the administration’s repeated promises to continue food aid, and Rubio’s testimony that he would not allow existing food to go to waste, even more food could soon expire. Hundreds of thousands of boxes of emergency food pastes, also already purchased, are currently collecting dust in American warehouses. According to USAID inventory lists from January, more than 60,000 metric tons of food—much of it grown in America, and all already purchased by the U.S. government—were then sitting in warehouses across the world. That included 36,000 pounds of peas, oil, and cereal, which were stored in Djibouti and intended for distribution in Sudan and other countries in the Horn of Africa. A former senior official at USAID’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance told me that, by the time she’d left her job earlier this month, very little of the food seemed to have moved; one of the current USAID employees I spoke with confirmed her impression, though he noted that, in recent weeks, small shipments have begun leaving the Djibouti warehouse.

[Read: ‘In three months, half of them will be dead’]

Such operations are more difficult for USAID to manage today than they were last year because many of the humanitarian workers and supply-chain experts who once coordinated the movement of American-grown food to hungry people around the world no longer have their jobs. Last month, the CEOs of the two American companies that make another kind of emergency food for malnourished children both told The New York Times that the government seemed unsure of how to ship the food it had already purchased. Nor, they told me, have they received any new orders. (A State Department spokesperson told me that the department had recently approved additional purchases, but both CEOs told me they have yet to receive the orders. The State Department has not responded to further questions about these purchases.) But even if the Trump administration decides tomorrow to buy more food aid—or simply distribute what the government already owns while the food is still useful—it may no longer have the capacity to make sure anyone receives it.

brithistorian: (Default)
brithistorian ([personal profile] brithistorian) wrote2025-07-14 09:00 pm
Entry tags:

Computers, do computer things better!

I love YouTube Music — it's a great streaming system and gives me access to music that I could only have dreamed of when I was younger. But there's one thing about it — a small thing really, but still big enough that it bothers me: When you have a playlist, it should be a trivial thing for the software to add up the running times of all the songs in the playlist and give you a runtime for the playlist, and this works for shorter playlists, but once a playlist reaches 5 hours or more in length, the program gets lazy and anything over 5 hours is either "5+ hours" or "5 hours [XX] minutes," where [XX] isn't the actual number of minutes past 5 hours, instead the point after 5 hours where the software got lazy and decided to stop adding. Not a deal killer, not even that big of a deal, really, but it's annoying.

sovay: (Morell: quizzical)
sovay ([personal profile] sovay) wrote2025-07-14 11:24 am

Went to the doctor, turns out I'm sick

My week seems to have started with catapulting myself on zero sleep to a specialist's appointment starting half an hour from the end of the phone call, so I am eating a bagel with lox and trying not to feel that the earth acquires a new axial tilt every time I turn my head. Paying bills, shockingly, has not improved my mood.

After enjoying both The Big Pick-Up (1955) and The Flight of the Phoenix (1964), I was disappointed by Elleston Trevor's The Burning Shore (U.S. The Pasang Run, 1961), which ironically for its airport setting never really seemed to get its plot off the ground and in any case its ratio of romantic melodrama and ambient racism to actual aviation was not ideal, but I am a little sorry that it was not adapted for film like its fellows, since I would have liked to see the casting for the initially peripheral, ultimately book-stealing role of Tom Thorne, the decorated and disgraced surgeon gone in the Conradian manner to ground in the tropics, because of his unusual fragility: it is de rigueur for his archetype that he should pull himself out of his opium-mired death-spiral for the sake of a passenger flight downed in flames, but he remains an impulsive suicide risk even when his self-respect should conventionally have been restored. He is described as having the face of a hurt clown. He'd have been any character actor's gift.

Mostly I like that Wolf Alice named themselves after the short story by Angela Carter, but the chorus of "The Sofa" (2025) really is attractive right now.
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal ([syndicated profile] smbc_comics_feed) wrote2025-07-14 11:20 am

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal - Waa

Posted by Zach Weinersmith



Click here to go see the bonus panel!

Hovertext:
It's not the talking that's so creepy, but the baritone.


Today's News:
Daily Prompts ([syndicated profile] dailyprompts_feed) wrote2025-07-14 09:08 am

Vampire lore is well established. Aversion to sunlight, must be invited in, wooden stake through the

Vampire lore is well established. Aversion to sunlight, must be invited in, wooden stake through the heart, etc. What new thing would you add?

daniel.haxx.se ([syndicated profile] daniel_haxx_feed) wrote2025-07-14 10:38 am

Death by a thousand slops

Posted by Daniel Stenberg

I have previously blogged about the relatively new trend of AI slop in vulnerability reports submitted to curl and how it hurts and exhausts us.

This trend does not seem to slow down. On the contrary, it seems that we have recently not only received more AI slop but also more human slop. The latter differs only in the way that we cannot immediately tell that an AI made it, even though we many times still suspect it. The net effect is the same.

The general trend so far in 2025 has been way more AI slop than ever before (about 20% of all submissions) as we have averaged in about two security report submissions per week. In early July, about 5% of the submissions in 2025 had turned out to be genuine vulnerabilities. The valid-rate has decreased significantly compared to previous years.

We have run the curl Bug Bounty since 2019 and I have previously considered it a success based on the amount of genuine and real security problems we have gotten reported and thus fixed through this program. 81 of them to be exact, with over 90,000 USD paid in awards.

End of the road?

While we are not going to do anything rushed or in panic immediately, there are reasons for us to consider changing the setup. Maybe we need to drop the monetary reward?

I want us to use the rest of the year 2025 to evaluate and think. The curl bounty program continues to run and we deal with everything as before while we ponder about what we can and should do to improve the situation. For the sanity of the curl security team members.

We need to reduce the amount of sand in the machine. We must do something to drastically reduce the temptation for users to submit low quality reports. Be it with AI or without AI.

The curl security team consists of seven team members. I encourage the others to also chime in to back me up (so that we act right in each case). Every report thus engages 3-4 persons. Perhaps for 30 minutes, sometimes up to an hour or three. Each.

I personally spend an insane amount of time on curl already, wasting three hours still leaves time for other things. My fellows however are not full time on curl. They might only have three hours per week for curl. Not to mention the emotional toll it takes to deal with these mind-numbing stupidities.

Times eight the last week alone.

Reputation doesn’t help

On HackerOne the users get their reputation lowered when we close reports as not applicable. That is only really a mild “threat” to experienced HackerOne participants. For new users on the platform that is mostly a pointless exercise as they can just create a new account next week. Banning those users is similarly a rather toothless threat.

Besides, there seem to be so many so even if one goes away, there are a thousand more.

HackerOne

It is not super obvious to me exactly how HackerOne should change to help us combat this. It is however clear that we need them to do something. Offer us more tools and knobs to tweak, to save us from drowning. If we are to keep the program with them.

I have yet again reached out. We will just have to see where that takes us.

Possible routes forward

People mention charging a fee for the right to submit a security vulnerability (that could be paid back if a proper report). That would probably slow them down significantly sure, but it seems like a rather hostile way for an Open Source project that aims to be as open and available as possible. Not to mention that we don’t have any current infrastructure setup for this – and neither does HackerOne. And managing money is painful.

Dropping the monetary reward part would make it much less interesting for the general populace to do random AI queries in desperate attempts to report something that could generate income. It of course also removes the traction for some professional and highly skilled security researchers, but maybe that is a hit we can/must take?

As a lot of these reporters seem to genuinely think they help out, apparently blatantly tricked by the marketing of the AI hype-machines, it is not certain that removing the money from the table is going to completely stop the flood. We need to be prepared for that as well. Let’s burn that bridge if we get to it.

The AI slop list

If you are still innocently unaware of what AI slop means in the context of security reports, I have collected a list of a number of reports submitted to curl that help showcase. Here’s a snapshot of the list from today:

  1. [Critical] Curl CVE-2023-38545 vulnerability code changes are disclosed on the internet. #2199174
  2. Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in WebSocket Handling #2298307
  3. Exploitable Format String Vulnerability in curl_mfprintf Function #2819666
  4. Buffer overflow in strcpy #2823554
  5. Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in strcpy() Leading to Remote Code Execution #2871792
  6. Buffer Overflow Risk in Curl_inet_ntop and inet_ntop4 #2887487
  7. bypass of this Fixed #2437131 [ Inadequate Protocol Restriction Enforcement in curl ] #2905552
  8. Hackers Attack Curl Vulnerability Accessing Sensitive Information #2912277
  9. (“possible”) UAF #2981245
  10. Path Traversal Vulnerability in curl via Unsanitized IPFS_PATH Environment Variable #3100073
  11. Buffer Overflow in curl MQTT Test Server (tests/server/mqttd.c) via Malicious CONNECT Packet #3101127
  12. Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm (CWE-327) in libcurl #3116935
  13. Double Free Vulnerability in libcurl Cookie Management (cookie.c) #3117697
  14. HTTP/2 CONTINUATION Flood Vulnerability #3125820
  15. HTTP/3 Stream Dependency Cycle Exploit #3125832
  16. Memory Leak #3137657
  17. Memory Leak in libcurl via Location Header Handling (CWE-770) #3158093
  18. Stack-based Buffer Overflow in TELNET NEW_ENV Option Handling #3230082
  19. HTTP Proxy Bypass via CURLOPT_CUSTOMREQUEST Verb Tunneling #3231321
  20. Use-After-Free in OpenSSL Keylog Callback via SSL_get_ex_data() in libcurl #3242005
  21. HTTP Request Smuggling Vulnerability Analysis – cURL Security Report #3249936
hudebnik: (Default)
hudebnik ([personal profile] hudebnik) wrote2025-07-13 11:43 pm
Entry tags:

Rebuilding after Trumpism

Eventually Donald Trump will be dead, and since his movement has never had any coherent principles except abject fealty to him, it will probably disintegrate into several feuding factions. And those of us who love America [by which, throughout this piece, I mean the United States] and democracy will be left to rebuild what he destroyed.

But just rebuilding what we had before he announced his candidacy for the Presidency in 2015 won't do: there really were ways that American society and American government failed a large fraction of the American people and fed the resentments that led them to elect Trump twice. So I'd like to discuss overarching principles and how things could be improved from what they were in 2015.

I've been thinking about this for months if not years, but was recently inspired by "Feudalism is our Future" in the Atlantic. It's probably behind a paywall, but to summarize...

The author Cullen Murphy, author of Are We Rome? The Fall of an Empire and the Fate of America, recalls years of correspondence with Ramsay McMullen, author of Corruption and the Decline of Rome. McMullen summarized the evolution of Rome in three words: "Fewer have more". He observed a steady trend of privatization of government duties: more and more aspects of "running the Empire" were sub-contracted out to private entities whose own interests often outweighed their accountability to their employer. The top levels of government might sincerely have the public interest in mind, but those orders passed through multiple layers of privatized players in a game of "Telephone", resulting in something completely different happening on the ground.

As Murphy points out, a similar privatization trend has been apparent in many developed nations, particularly the US, since about 1980. The government's "monopoly on the legitimate use of force" is being replaced by private security companies (for crime prevention) and mercenary companies like Blackrock and Wagner (for war-fighting). The government-run, publicly-accountable court system is replaced by binding arbitration agreements and professional arbitrators chosen and paid by large corporations (and not surprisingly often favoring their interests). The government's monopoly on the money supply is being replaced right now by cryptocurrencies that seem to work better for large-scale corruption and Ponzi schemes than for anything ordinary people would want to do. Things built by and for the public -- parking meters, toll roads, parks -- are sold off to private companies with "anti-compete" clauses preventing the public from building or improving anything that would serve the same purpose. In all these ways, accountability to the public interest is being replaced by accountability to the shareholders of large corporations.

Anyway, this brings us to my first principle:


  1. The public sector must serve the public interest.

  2. The motivation for "democratic" governments is to have government functions accountable to "the people", rather than to a self-selected and self-perpetuating elite, or to regulated industries that capture control of their regulators. Whenever government does something harmful to "the people" at large, the people have to have the power to remove and replace those responsible, at least at the top levels. The people will inevitably make some mistakes in exercising this power, as witness the current administration, but it's better for them to have that power, including the power to correct their own previous mistakes, than to not have it at all.

    In order for the people to have the power to replace their leaders in practice, the electoral process must be rigorously insulated from political influence by those elected leaders. Obviously, we need somebody accountable to the public to make broad policy decisions about how elections are to be run, but the day-to-day mechanisms have to be carried out by professionals without political bias. And perhaps there should be a meta-rule that any law change affecting the conduct of elections doesn't take effect until after the next election.

    But it's not only elections that should be professional and unbiased; one could say the same for most governmental operations. Which leads us to...

  3. The public sector must work well and fairly.

  4. Liberals and conservatives will always disagree about the proper role and scope of government, and the answers to those questions will inevitably change with every election, but whatever government does do, there's a public interest in it being done well, which means government workers (except those elected directly by the people) need to be objectively competent. Ideally, they should also be honest and unbiased, doing their jobs without favor based on personal connections, bribery, or political affiliation. Those workers need to be hired, promoted, and fired on the basis of merit, not personal loyalty or political affiliation; their loyalty must be to the law and the public interest, not to any individual or political movement. The mass of competent, knowledgeable bureaucrats who will keep doing their jobs regardless of what individual or political party happens to oversee them at the moment may be called the "deep state", and that's a good thing.

  5. Meritocracy and independence from political interference must be enshrined in law, and that law must be obeyed.

  6. Elected political leaders of a certain personality type will inevitably want to push back on these limits, firing people who disagree with them and installing people whose personal loyalty to the leader outweighs their loyalty to the law and the public. In our reality-timeline, we have legal protections for those limits: Congress has passed numerous laws saying such-and-such office is filled on nomination by the President and confirmation by the Senate, or holders of such-and-such office can only be fired for performance-related reasons, explained in writing to Congress, and with thirty days' notice. Those laws are still on the books, but President Trump has simply ignored them, firing inspectors-general and members of legally-protected governmental panels without cause or notice, and paid no price for it whatsoever. Likewise, laws specify how and why non-political government workers can be fired or laid-off, but the Trump administration has ignored these laws too, with mixed results in the courts but again no price paid. (In a game of "heads I win, tails I don't lose", it pays to play as often and as aggressively as possible.)

    The Trump administration's position on such laws is that they're inherently un-Constitutional, a case of Congress interfering in the conduct of the Executive branch. Which is nonsense: a law isn't passed by Congress alone, so a law doesn't belong to Congress alone. Congress wrote those laws, they were signed by a President, and they've been interpreted and applied by the Courts; all three branches have already had their say, and those laws are now the law of the land.

    The administration argument amounts to saying "laws don't apply to the executive branch". We obviously can't have that. So

  7. The Executive branch, including the President itself, must obey the law.

  8. This should be a no-brainer, since the Executive's main job under the Constitution is to carry out the law, and the public can't trust you to carry it out if you don't bother to obey it yourself. The 2024 SCOTUS decision that Presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for (as I read it) anything they do using Presidential powers will go down in history with Dred Scott, Plessy v. Ferguson, and Korematsu as the worst decisions in Supreme Court history. I wrote about this extensively when it happened, and I sha'n't repeat that here.

    The problem, of course, is that if the President or a close ally breaks the law, somebody has to investigate and enforce it, and the President oversees all the investigators and enforcers. Under the Constitution as currently written, Congress has impeachment power, and can theoretically "enforce" such a law by at least removing a President or other political appointee from office, after which (assuming U.S. v. Trump 2024 is reversed, either by SCOTUS or by Constitutional amendment) the person can be charged and tried through ordinary criminal-justice procedures. Unfortunately, Congress doesn't have a strong investigative arm; that expertise is mostly in the Justice Department. Which is why we have Special Counsels, to enable somebody to investigate politically-tinged cases with at least some insulation from political influence. We need to formalize that process, either re-passing some kind of Independent Counsel law or building a corresponding investigative arm under Congress's direct control.

    One kind of law that Presidents frequently want to violate is appropriations bills, specifying for what purposes taxpayer dollars are to be spent. President Nixon decided unilaterally not to spend money on programs that Congress had said it had to be spent on, and Congress responded with the "Impoundment Control Act", saying explicitly that a President couldn't do that. President Trump in his first term unilaterally reallocated billions of dollars from military readiness to building a border wall that Congress had repeatedly refused to fund. In the first few months of his second term, he's gone much farther, shutting down not only individual programs but entire taxpayer-funded agencies without even consulting Congress. And Congress hasn't officially said a word, because the majority in both houses is of the President's own party, and they're all terrified of crossing him in the slightest way. Appropriations bills, like other laws, must be obeyed, with an enforcement mechanism and penalties for violating them.. If you don't like a particular program, negotiate to defund it in next year's budget; this year's budget has the force of law, so don't break it.

    The First Amendment starts "Congress shall make no law respecting..." and then lists a bunch of things Congress can't make laws about. It doesn't say "The President shall make no law respecting...", because that goes without saying: in the original intent of the Constitution, the Executive Branch doesn't make laws at all, it only carries them out. If Congress didn't make a law about something, the Executive Branch has no authority to enforce it. But in practice, any Executive Branch function necessarily involves a lot of decisions and rules about subtle details that politicians, by and large, don't even understand. Government functions better when those decisions and rules are made by subject experts... but they still have to be accountable to the public.

  9. Congress needs to set broad policy priorities, making clear exactly what authority it's delegating to the subject experts, and retaining the power to overrule them.

  10. There have been a lot of court cases in recent decades about whether or not an executive agency had the authority to make a particular rule. The principle of "Chevron deference" has allowed a lot of sensible environment and worker-safety rules to be enacted without specific authorization from Congress, which is why right-wingers have been trying for years to persuade the Supreme Court to reverse the Chevron ruling... but they have a legitimate point that all rule-making authority ultimately comes from the Legislative branch, and if that branch wants subject-area experts in the executive branch to do part of the work, it needs to explicitly authorize them to do so.

    (Alternatively, Congress could hire a bunch of subject-area experts directly before writing a law, but this has problems too. A law that tries to specify all the potentially necessary rules will be much longer and more detailed than existing laws, and will still inevitably miss some unforeseen situations about which the executive-branch employees who have to actually apply these rules will still have to make decisions on a shorter deadline than that needed to amend a law.)

    This will inevitably mean some sensible, rational policies getting overruled for political reasons. I don't think we can avoid that and retain public accountability. Likewise, Congress will sometimes pass carve-outs such as "The XYZ agency shall have authority to make rules to implement this Act, except that no such rule shall affect left-handed fnord-wranglers in states whose names end with the letter A." Again, I don't think we can avoid this, but only publicly embarrass members of Congress who demand such carve-outs.



It's late; I'll publish what I've got so far and add onto it later. Comments welcome.
prisca: (empire mod)
prisca ([personal profile] prisca) wrote in [community profile] fandom_empire2025-07-13 09:46 pm

Fortune Wheel 02.25: Playlist Week 10

And here you find this week's playlist.

Short reminder:
You can post unlimited works, but the total weekly regular points are 15.
You don't have to use both prompts, but you can reach maximum points by using one prompt only.
The lucky color can bring some extra points when following some special rules (optional!)
The color is always connected with the given prompt (color 1 belongs to prompt 1 / color 2 belongs to prompt 2)
You can earn extra points once for each prompt.

Color blue = write a fic in first person or create three icons with a plain blue background
Color orange = write a crossover or create a graphic work based on two different fandoms
Color yellow = write a 'dialogue only' ficlet or create two 'text only' graphics bigger than an icon
Color white = write an poem (haiku is fine) or create two icons based on any RL character(s)
Color green = Joker: you will earn five extra points for free
Color red = Zonk: you won't earn any extra points for the connected prompt

Complete rules/points H E R E

If you want to participate in the team challenge (even if you didn't sign up, feel free to join as a joker at any time), go H E R E

Don't forget that you have three wildcards to swap a prompt for any from your prompt list. The lucky number remains unaffected!

Catch up
Some participants have missed posting last week. They are marked with 'catch up' in the list.
For this week your maximum points increase from 15 to 30.
You can use each lucky color twice to earn some extra points (Joker excluded!).

Hiatus List
Participants who have missed more than three weeks in a row will be moved to the hiatus list. Don't worry, this is only to keep the playlist easier to handle. You are more than welcome to jump back into the game at any time.

Playlist under the cut )

Hiatuslist under the cut )

Posting for this week officially ends Sunday, July 20 17.00 UTC. There is a grace period until the week is finally called 'closed'.
prisca: (empire mod)
prisca ([personal profile] prisca) wrote in [community profile] fandom_empire2025-07-13 08:25 pm

Fortune Wheel 02.25: Weekly Score 9

Posting for week nine is closed now. Thank you to everyone participating. You all are amazing!

Regular Challenge
We have had a total of 13 participants; 8 reached the maximum regular points.

Team Challenge
We have had 7 participants in the team challenge.

Team Omega has completed the 'grey' column; the team earns two points, and every participant who has filled a 'grey' prompt earns one point for each fill.

This week's lucky color is grey. Congratulations and two points for each filled 'grey' prompt go to [personal profile] peppermint_shamrock, [personal profile] pattrose and [personal profile] ziazippy5379.

Points in Total
[personal profile] ziazippy5379 is at the top of the total highscore list with 223 points.

To check out all scores, have a look at the Highscore Sheets. If you find a mistake or have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me.

The playlist for Week 10 will be available soon.