blimix: Joe by a creek in the woods (Hat)
Joe ([personal profile] blimix) wrote2004-11-03 12:46 am
Entry tags:

I've coined a word.

Coprocracy. Rule by human excrement.

(Okay, a Google search shows that someone named Koster beat me to it.)

I didn't need a majority vote to further my faith in human stupidity.

I really didn't.

(BTW, does anyone have an idea of whether voter suppression and/or election fraud could have accounted for Bush's 2.7% lead (as of this post) in Ohio?)

Ordinarily, I wouldn't waste your time and mine by posting what we're all thinking. But I had to share the word "coprocracy".

Edit: Ah, so Ohio was using Diebold machines. How widespread were they? The answer to that will affect whether I start referring to Bush as the president.

Edit edit: It's not just Diebold in on this. Kerry seems to have won the popular vote in Florida and Ohio; just not the electronically counted (official) vote. Hence, Bush retains his title of "Dirtbag". (This is merely my extrapolation from the data available (once I found relevant data - it took a while). I have no privileged information.)

[identity profile] blimix.livejournal.com 2004-11-04 09:12 am (UTC)(link)
My extensive searches have been fruitless. (It's too new to have hit Google, I guess.) Where can I find the source(s) for this?

5% is enough for Diebold to have made good on its promise to hand Ohio to Bush. Heck, it's enough to fully reverse the lead in Florida!