The article never addressed the idea that the vote tallying computers, rather than (only?) the individual voting machines, may have been hacked. It was dismissive of the possibility of election hacking, despite the fact that it has happened before. So I'm going to wait and see. I'm sure a better analysis (than either that one or Bill Palmer's) will come along soon.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: 538 doesn't think it was hacking
Date: 2016-11-24 03:14 pm (UTC)