The Lack of Reason for God, Epilogue

This is part of a series examining the the logic of Timothy Keller's book The Reason for God: Belief in an Age of Skepticism.

Standard disclaimer: This, despite being a public post, is not an invitation for a religion debate with strangers. Been there, done that, still jaded.

Last week: Chapter 14 spouted vague nonsense about the holy trinity.

( This week: Just a few rambles in the epilogue. )

Next week: Nothing! We're done! (Okay, there's a short wrap-up.)

The whole series.

The Lack of Reason for God (Summary)

The Reason For God, by Timothy Keller, is a work of Christian apologetics. It claims to present a case for god and for Christianity, using reason and logic to appeal to skeptics. It is an example of a class of books that achieve unwarranted sales by virtue of churchgoers buying many copies each, to hand out to unbelievers so that they might be converted. I was one such recipient.

Essentially, these sales constitute a scam. The reasoning presented by the book is so thoroughly and consistently unsound that it cannot appeal to anyone who does not already hold the views of the author. Those buying the book in hopes of winning converts have spent their money (and time) in vain.

I had begun to dissect the logic of the book when I first received it, but quickly lost interest due to the lack of challenge this presented. More recently, a Christian friend of mine began reading the book, and having problems with it. So we began taking notes, and meeting weekly to discuss each chapter. One problem was that Keller's reasoning process was often obscure: There were several points where it was not easy to discern how Keller had intended one idea to support an earlier or later one. The other problem involved the format of the first half of the book: In each chapter, Keller would introduce an objection either to theism or to Christianity in particular, then spend the rest of the chapter trying to argue against that objection. His arguments were so weak (and sometimes incomprehensible) that the still viable objections were pushing my friend toward atheism. I was able to clarify some of the arguments, but even then, they gained no credibility. Keller's system backfired, and in consequence of reading this book, my friend has become more solidly agnostic.

Over the past few months, I have published my notes on the book in serial form. You can find "The Lack of Reason For God" collected here:

• Introduction
  
• Chapter 1: The divisiveness of Christianity.
  
• Chapter 2: Why does god allow evil?
  
• Chapter 3: Christianity's restrictions on intellectual freedom.
  
• Chapter 4: Injustice in the name of Christianity.
  
• Chapter 5: A loving god sends people to Hell.
  
• Chapter 6: The conflict between science and Christianity.
  
• Chapter 7: Can you take the Bible literally?
  
• Intermission: A switch from arguing against skepticism to arguing for theism and Christianity. Also bad epistemology.
  
• Chapter 8: Evidence for the existence of god.
  
• Chapter 9: Atheists really believe in god.
  
• Chapter 10: Building one's identity without god.
  
• Chapter 11: Salvation through god's grace rather than good works.
  
• Chapter 12: The crucifixion.
  
• Chapter 13: The resurrection.
  
• Chapter 14: The holy trinity.
  
• Epilogue: Conversion.
  
  This post, collecting the entries, would be a suitable place to comment on the project as a whole, on the book, or even on the field of Christian apologetics. However, if you are looking for a religion debate with a stranger, look elsewhere. (This includes you, Timothy Keller. Straw man arguments make baby Jesus cry.) If you're a friend of mine looking for a religion debate, I'm game, and we can surely find a better venue than the comments section.

The Lack of Reason for God, Epilogue and Summary

It's all done! Regarding The Reason for God, I have now posted my response to the epilogue, and a wrap-up/summary/overview of the project. Enjoy!

To those who have waded through part or all of this project, thank you! I have appreciated the occasional comments, both for their insights and for the indication that more than one person was reading it.

Now that it's done, I'll link to the summary on some social media site that people actually use, in case somebody somewhere finds it useful.